I don’t know why we’d take this position
Since it seems contrary to the mission.
The threat of attack is a deterrent
And the threats against us are recurrent.
Why limit the options on the table
When so much of the world is so unstable?
I don’t know why we’d take this position
Since it seems contrary to the mission.
The threat of attack is a deterrent
And the threats against us are recurrent.
Why limit the options on the table
When so much of the world is so unstable?